@92YHQCV

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, immigrants should choose whether they want to learn English OR Not, and for those that do, the government should provide them with free language learning courses, but Personally, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, du moment qu'ils peuvent retourner dans leur pays en toute sécurité.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, à condition qu'ils soient soumis à la même procédure de vérification de leurs antécédents que les couples hétérosexuels

J>J  Réponse personnellePro-choix, et fournir des moyens de contraception, assurer l'éducation sexuelle, et plus de services sociaux aidera à réduire le nombre d'avortements

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, et les entreprises devraient être sommées de publier leurs échelles salariales pour chaque poste

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence, because too many people are innocently convicted. Plus, I think that spending life in prison is a harsher sentence because the dead don't suffer unless their soul was sent to hell that is.

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes. However, it should only cover very basic and simple topics, but if they want to, then they can be allowed to take a test that tests more than just a basic level of understanding

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, but only if there is no chance they will survive their illness, and after a psychological examination to show they fully understand this choice

J>J  Réponse personnelleIt Depends. If they have finished serving their sentence (for a minor crime (e.g., protesting)), then-Yes. However, if A. the crime was committed while in office & B. it was a felony, violent, financial, sexual, etc., crime, then-No. Still, we should disallow politicians that are OR get put under investigation for a crime, whether before OR while running for office.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, nous devons investir dans des énergies alternatives plus propres comme le vent, l'hydroélectrique, le thorium et le géothermique

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, we should respect all cultural traditions, but their identity must be privately verified by a female staff member, just in case.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, refuser des migrants seulement à cause de leur religion est anticonstitutionnel

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, and remove all existing tax loopholes for large corporations, and lower taxes for the poor.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, this is a violation of free speech, but even though I don’t respect anyone who does but they should have the right to do so. Plus, it Personally believe that it has now become just a piece of cloth that doesn’t represent what it should anymore, because America is an Oligarchy and NOT a Democracy

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, but only after living in the country for between 5 - 10 years, and even then, they will only be allowed to vote only in local elections, until they become full-fledged citizens of the United States

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo because this would increase the risk of accidental shootings, therefore schools should hire trained professional security guards.

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, just as long as the person under the age of 18 years old fully understands the choice of this irreversible life decision

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, afin d'en faire un salaire décent

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, et le gouvernement devrait en faire davantage pour exiger la parité sur le lieu de travail.

J>J  Réponse personnelleMoins, et s'assurer que les aides vont à ceux qui en ont le plus besoin

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo. However the sentence should depend on why the person was trafficking drugs in the first place.

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, and voters should be required to pass a basic test demonstrating their understanding of politics in order to vote

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, notre système de santé mentale a besoin de plus d'argent pour pouvoir fournir des soins et des services de meilleure qualité

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, le service devrait être un choix plutôt qu'une obligation

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, instead we should A. reduce military spending, B. focus on ending tax evasion, and C. increase taxes on the wealthy

J>J  Réponse personnelleAt this point, I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech, but it should all depend on the circumstances. Yes, a person’s hate speech can be protected by the first amendment, just as long as it does not encourage people to commit acts of violence against others. Still, I (personally) believe that the freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, but they should be kept somewhere safe like a migrant-specific shelter with all basic necessities provided until they’re thoroughly screened and cleared

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais uniquement pour les maladies mortelles contagieuses.

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, unless they have committed a very serious crime OR an act of terrorism

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, higher agencies should handle extreme situations with specialized training and equipment. However, if police departments are given strict training on how and when to use the equipment, and will only use military-grade equipment in response to extreme situations like the higher agencies with specialized training and equipment, then Yes.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais l'OTAN doit se concentrer davantage sur les stratégies antiterroristes

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men because preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

J>J  Réponse personnelleRaise for large multinational corporations but lower for small businesses while eliminating deductions and loop holes.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, they should be instead captured, (humanly) interrogated, given a fair trial, and imprisoned instead because assassinating suspected terrorists can pose a real Public Relations problem for us, whether they are guilty OR NOT.

J>J  Réponse personnelleDiminuer

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, for most but not all drugs, and we should also retroactively reduce sentences for those already serving time

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, et interdire tous les produits jetables qui ne contiennent pas au moins 75 % de matériaux biodégradables

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, les prisons privées sacrifieront la qualité des soins et les services de réadaptation au profit

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais seulement si leurs niveaux d’hormones sont équivalents à ceux de la catégorie de genre dans laquelle ils se font concurrence

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais pas pour les cosmétiques

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleIncrease, but only for countries with no human rights violations/countries that are legitimately trying to improve and modernize.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, l'abus de drogues doit être traité comme un problème de santé et non un problème pénal

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, and provide more free public transportation, but only if the spending goes towards environmentally friendly solutions

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, every citizen deserves the right to vote, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes,but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, but only for medical use, and A. immediately release anyone serving time solely for drug offenses, & B. legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana instead of criminalizing it.

J>J  Réponse personnelleDiminuer, les entreprises profitent actuellement de ce programme pour diminuer les salaires

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, but the funding for local police departments and social & community-based programs should be split equally. However, for police departments in higher crime rate communities, then the funding and training should increase.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, le gouvernement ne devrait pas déterminer ce qui constitue des nouvelles authentiques ou des fausses nouvelles.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais sous la forme d'allégements fiscaux pour les citoyens à faibles revenus

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, mais augmenter de façon drastique les impôts et les tarifs d'importation pour les entreprises qui externalisent

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, after all, we should not try to influence any other country’s elections or policy because it’s not only ended in disaster in the long run, but it would be considered a Crime against Democracy, aka Democracide. However, personally, we should, but only to A. address security threats, not monetary interests, B. protect the country from human rights violations by a tyrannical ruler, and C. influence public opinion, & not tamper with a fair voting process, just as long as our actions are not considered a Democracide aka Crimes against Democracy, then I’m for it.

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais seulement les fermes locales de taille modeste, et non les grandes corporations.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, nous devons plutôt développer davantage les énergies renouvelables

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, dépensez cet argent pour améliorer l’infrastructure et la communauté afin d’attirer les entreprises

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, but they must perform community service on a daily basis while under house arrest using an electronic bracelet.

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, this system guarantees healthcare for everyone and private companies should not be able to profit off of healthcare. This should be in form of tax and should not be that expensive.

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, even though officials gain valuable experience and become more effective representatives over time, term limits will increase performance and prevent corruption

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais seulement si la publication des informations ne nuit pas à la sécurité intérieure

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, tout le monde devrait recevoir un revenu pour couvrir les besoins de base, y compris la nourriture et le logement

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, nous devons d'abord employer toutes les options diplomatiques

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, et les politiciens de tout âge devraient être tenus de passer un test de capacité mentale

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, et créer plus de programmes sociaux pour fournir gratuitement de la nourriture, des vêtements et des médicaments

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, but they should be given the option to remove the ad if the information in it is all false [and/or] misleading

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, seulement s'ils ont des antécédents criminels liés à l’abus de drogues

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, because these types of donations just turn into bribes from corporations, but allow donations from unions and non-profits, since (I think) they don't have a record of bribing political parties

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais avec une responsabilité stricte.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, cela va nuire à nos entreprises manufacturières qui ont besoin d’importer des matériaux à bas prix pour fabriquer leurs produits

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, and adjust them yearly so that retired government workers can receive an income to cover the basic necessities including food and housing

J>J  Réponse personnelleIls apportent une aide

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon, le gouvernement ne devrait jamais détenir d’actions de sociétés privées

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais uniquement par rapport à la contribution des autres pays

J>J  Réponse personnelleTest it first, and if it has no unforeseen negative consequences, then begin researching into geoengineering as a way to combat climate change, but at the hint of unforeseen negative consequences coming into play, then geoengineering is to be shutdown

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais seulement s’ils utilisent des sources d’énergie renouvelables

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes, until Israel and Palestine can Peacefully coexist with each other, then I want to propose for My Idea called Holy Land Reunification (German: Wiedervereinigung des Heiligen Landes, Russian: Воссоединение Святой Земли, Korean: 성지통일, Swahili: Kuunganishwa tena kwa Ardhi Takatifu, Chinese (Simplified): 圣地统一, Chinese (Traditional): 聖地統一, Spanish: Reunificación de Tierra Santa, Portuguese: Reunificação da Terra Santa, French: Réunification de la Terre Sainte, Greek: Επανένωση των Αγίων Τόπων, Latin: Terra Sancta Reunificatio, Hebrew: איחוד ארץ הקודש, Arabic: إعادة توحيد الأراضي المقدسة, Persian: اتحاد مجدد سرزمین مقدس) is the potential unification of the modern State of Israel and the State of Palestine into a single sovereign state, without both firing a shot & shedding a Drop of Blood, that everyone in both countries agree to.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, and neither should corporations and business organizations because of the abuse of loopholes in order to evade taxes.

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, plus we should treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, because the level of unpredictability makes cryptocurrency simply untenable = flawed

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui

J>J  Réponse personnelleNon

J>J  Réponse personnelleNo, because that could Risk starting World War III, which could then evolve into a Nuclear War, which will end in Nuclear Armageddon aka a Nuclear Holocaust, resulting in the end of the world

J>J  Réponse personnelleOui, mais seulement s’il est vraiment décentralisé et ne peut être manipulé par aucune personne, groupe ou agence gouvernementale

J>J  Réponse personnelleYes & No, because Banning TikTok is a violation of free speech, but at the same time, we should do more to stop China from collecting data on our citizens.

J>J  Réponse personnelleBoth Equally, to a degree, but if I had to choose only one, then I would say that I sympathize with Palestine more because of how Innocent People of Gaza are Victims of Israeli War Crimes?