Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › 移民同化
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应该拥抱移民为我们社会的多样性作出的贡献 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer不,就连大多数公民都无法通过公民资格测试 |
移民 › EU Migrant Quota
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer不 |
科学 › 核能
9>9 Personal answerYes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives and nationalise the industry |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerLess, and there should be no privatization of the healthcare industry |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Terrorism Surveillance
9>9 Personal answerNo, only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning an attack |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › Foreigner Mosque Funding
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Assisted Reproductive Technology
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › 动物权益
9>9 Personal answerYes, and the government should do more to protect the treatment of animals |
外交政策 › Colonization of Algeria
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 俄国
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
总统大选 › Elected Representatives
9>9 Personal answerNo, this would give too much political power to a small number of representatives |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Gender Transition
9>9 Personal answerNo, children should not be allowed to make irreversible life decisions |
经济 › Universal Wage
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Central EU Agency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Solidarity Tax
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
9>9 Personal answerYes, as long as it does not threaten violence |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
外交政策 › 北约
9>9 Personal answerNo, it is obsolete and should be abolished |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer是的,社交媒体上有太多的假新闻和误报 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
国内政策 › Civil Service
9>9 Personal answer增加 |
国家安全 › Stationary Security Missions
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › Animal Testing
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Army
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Syria Travel Ban
9>9 Personal answer不 |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 任期限制
9>9 Personal answer应该,任期限制将提高绩效和防止腐败 |
医保 › 安全港
9>9 Personal answer应该,吸毒应当被视为健康问题,而非刑事问题。 |
移民 › Solidarity Offence
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
9>9 Personal answerUncertain |
外交政策 › European Union Countries
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Kurd
9>9 Personal answerI don’t know |
国内政策 › Article 49.3
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Four-day Workweek
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Alternate Circulation
9>9 Personal answerYes, and also increase government funding of public transportation, clean energy, and clean automobiles |
外交政策 › Post Brexit UK
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › De-radicalization Center
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
移民 › Migrant Children
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
罪行 › 监狱过度拥挤
9>9 Personal answer不应该,但是我们应该增加在为犯人提供教育和技能培训服务方面的资金 |
总统大选 › Political Party Subsidies
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 离岸银行业务
9>9 Personal answer不,太多富有的公民正在滥用海外银行法律的漏洞逃税 |
国家安全 › Emergency State
9>9 Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Le Touquet Accord
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Syrian Support Against ISIS
9>9 Personal answer不 |
总统大选 › Mental competency testing
9>9 Personal answerNo, this discriminates against older politicians |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
9>9 Personal answerYes, but with more transparency |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerYes, and create more social programs to provide free food, clothing, and medicine |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
9>9 Personal answer不 |
外交政策 › Ukraine and Nato
9>9 Personal answerNo, and abolish NATO |
交通运输 › Notre-Dame-des-Landes Airport
9>9 Personal answerNo, but there needs to be more consideration for the environment when building this airport |
经济 › State Ownership
9>9 Personal answerYes, the government should receive equity for any financial aid they provide to companies |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
9>9 Personal answer不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性 |
医保 › World Health Organization
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
环境 › Electric Vehicle Charging Stations
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Ukrainian Defense Funding
9>9 Personal answerNo, we cannot afford to give economic resources right now |
社会 › Teacher and Faculty Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
社会 › Employee Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
经济 › Cryptocurrency
9>9 Personal answer不 |
社会 › Student Diversity Training
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
医保 › Medical Consensus
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › Saudi Arabia and Iran
9>9 Personal answerYes, we should always promote diplomatic peace talks during foreign conflicts |
国内政策 › TikTok Ban
9>9 Personal answer不应该,这是对言论自由的侵犯 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 16 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 13 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 19 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 20 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 8 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.