Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
移民 › 移民同化
B>B Personal answer是的,但是政府应该提供免费的语言课程。 |
经济 › 同工同酬
B>B Personal answerWe should not force equality. Just ensure that man and woman are paid equally for equal qualifications. If one is more qualified and does the work better, he/she should get paid more than an underqualified lazy person, and the gender pay gap is a myth created by feminists, just like many other myths, to get sympathy. |
经济 › 税
B>B Personal answerNo, but stop the rich from exploiting loopholes to avoid taxes. If we are to lower taxes, especially for the poor, the rich must logically pick up some of the slack, but raising taxes is not the solution. Just ensure that the rich cannot avoid taxes. |
移民 › 公民考试
B>B Personal answerYes, but provide those who wish to become citizens a course to learn about us, ensure that they have the best chance of passing a test, and ensure that they are willing to be a patriot. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
B>B Personal answerYes. We must ensure that our screening process can improve to ensure that terrorism cannot enter the country before reaccepting Muslim immigrants. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
B>B Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
经济 › 最低工资
B>B Personal answerEvery state has a different standard of living. Each state should have the power to decide on a minimum wage. The federal government should only ensure that the minimum wage is not abused by state governments for politics. |
经济 › 社会福利
B>B Personal answerToo many fakers. We need to reform the system to root out fakers and immigrant non-citizens and those trying to avoid work and ensure that legal citizens who are genuinely trying to find work but can't receive welfare. So right now, I lean towards more. But whatever ensures reform sometimes. |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
B>B Personal answer不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品 |
医保 › 精神健康
B>B Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
科学 › 强制接种疫苗
B>B Personal answerNo, there are too many loopholes and legitimate reasons for people to not be able to have vaccines to institute a mandate. |
移民 › 双重国籍
B>B Personal answer不 |
社会 › Hate Speech
B>B Personal answerYes, but make sure people who use hate speech understand the consequences of using hate speech, especially those that threaten violence. |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
B>B Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 公司税
B>B Personal answerTrump did it right. If you tax them more, they will outsource more. Give incentives to move manufacturing and jobs back to the USA and it will improve our economy. But I agree that there are too many loopholes. Close some loopholes to ensure they pay their fair share. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
B>B Personal answer不 |
罪行 › Demilitarize the Police
B>B Personal answerNo, extreme situations should be handled by higher agencies with specialized training and equipment |
经济 › 经济刺激
B>B Personal answerStimulus exacerbates the problem. The poor must be given tax breaks, whilst the rich must have to pay a little bit higher taxes. Let the market correct itself over time. The government, besides using taxes, should only encourage people to work and correct recessions. Otherwise, it should sit back, correct misinformation, and let economists and the people handle recessions. |
环境 › Animal Testing
B>B Personal answerNot for cosmetics, and ensure that the animals are treated ethically. |
医保 › COVID Employment Health Pass
B>B Personal answerNo, I think businesses should require vaccination but not by government mandate |
国内政策 › 任期限制
B>B Personal answer是的 |
医保 › 安全港
B>B Personal answer不应该,这会促进药物的使用和减少康复中心的资金 |
移民 › 技术移民
B>B Personal answerI like the current amount, but reform the system so that companies cannot take advantage of the program to decrease wages. |
经济 › 全民基本收入
B>B Personal answerNo. I support a National Dividend and Social Credit program as proposed by economist CH Douglas. I think it could solve the problems of UBI but also provide some of the positives of the UBI. |
社会 › Transgender Athletes
B>B Personal answerIf a trans athlete can prove that them competing will not create an unfair advantage to themselves, then yes. Otherwise competitions reserve the right to refuse them and force them to compete in their biological sex group. |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
B>B Personal answerEqual funding for both, especially in higher crime rate communities |
经济 › 工会
B>B Personal answerTheoretically they're supposed to help us. But they are corrupt right now, in my opinion. Other than that, I am not well-versed in this subject to give a real opinion on unions. |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
B>B Personal answerYes as long as the company plans to employ local citizens of the area and I would prefer a lower corporate tax for all businesses, but I believe personally that this should be left to the states. |
外交政策 › Taliban Financial Aid
B>B Personal answer不 |
经济 › Tech Monopolies
B>B Personal answerNo, but the government should do everything in it's power to increase competition and free trade and ensure that these companies do not monopolize, even if it involves tax breaks, and ensure they respect the first amendment. |
国内政策 › Political Advertising on Social Media
B>B Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
B>B Personal answer是的 |
经济 › 福利毒品测试
B>B Personal answerYes, but only to establish why they need welfare. If they have a criminal record and aren't taking them because they're stressed about providing for their family, arrest them. Otherwise, provide treatment and ensure that welfare doesn't go towards buying booze or drugs. Also ensure that recipients are honest about themselves and don't lie. |
医保 › Vaccine Mandates for Customers
B>B Personal answerYes, if it is during a pandemic or if it is a small business and/or if it employs a number of disabled and sickly people. |
国内政策 › 网路中立性
B>B Personal answer不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格 |
医保 › World Health Organization
B>B Personal answerNo, it has shown to be ineffective |
外交政策 › 乌克兰
B>B Personal answerOnly if Ukraine is losing. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 11 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 7 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.