+

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.6k Champagne-Ardenne voters.

48%
Yes
52%
No
36%
Yes
48%
No
12%
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
3%
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
1%
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
1%
No, too many people are innocently convicted

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.6k Champagne-Ardenne voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.6k Champagne-Ardenne voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Champagne-Ardenne voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @9L5Z8PMfrom New Jersey  answered…8mos8MO

No, it is immoral. The fact that any people are innocently convicted and could lose their life for it is reprehensible.

 @9CWNCJYanswered…1yr1Y

Death sentence by womens awareness by breest cancers murder in new Zealand gangster and weeds hop

 @985VJSRanswered…2yrs2Y

An innocent person who got the death sentence can never be compensated. A dead criminal doesn't get enough much time to reflect on what they've done.

 @8Q5FHVXanswered…4yrs4Y

Nay. Let those who would duel for Justice do so.What's more pathetic than crones complaigning about Honour being a dead value ? Those who would oppose the instauration of environnemental conditions propicious for it, and vouch for americanism instead.