Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 96.3k Right voters.
69% Yes |
31% No |
59% Yes |
29% No |
10% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
1% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
0% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
0% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 96.3k Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 96.3k Right voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Right voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9ZPPX4J3mos3MO
Yes, but only with undeniable evidence, and sentence criminals to life in prison if the evidence is not undeniable
@9L5Z8PM11mos11MO
No, it is immoral. The fact that any people are innocently convicted and could lose their life for it is reprehensible.
@9D9N7PT2yrs2Y
Only for treason and military offences
@9CWNCJY2yrs2Y
Death sentence by womens awareness by breest cancers murder in new Zealand gangster and weeds hop
@985VJSR2yrs2Y
An innocent person who got the death sentence can never be compensated. A dead criminal doesn't get enough much time to reflect on what they've done.
@8Q5FHVX4yrs4Y
Nay. Let those who would duel for Justice do so.What's more pathetic than crones complaigning about Honour being a dead value ? Those who would oppose the instauration of environnemental conditions propicious for it, and vouch for americanism instead.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
