Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 400 Isère 1 voters.
37% Yes |
63% No |
27% Yes |
59% No |
10% Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
3% No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence |
0% Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment |
1% No, too many people are innocently convicted |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 400 Isère 1 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 400 Isère 1 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Isère 1 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9L5Z8PM8mos8MO
No, it is immoral. The fact that any people are innocently convicted and could lose their life for it is reprehensible.
@9D9N7PT1yr1Y
Only for treason and military offences
@9CWNCJY1yr1Y
Death sentence by womens awareness by breest cancers murder in new Zealand gangster and weeds hop
@985VJSR2yrs2Y
An innocent person who got the death sentence can never be compensated. A dead criminal doesn't get enough much time to reflect on what they've done.
@8Q5FHVX4yrs4Y
Nay. Let those who would duel for Justice do so.What's more pathetic than crones complaigning about Honour being a dead value ? Those who would oppose the instauration of environnemental conditions propicious for it, and vouch for americanism instead.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Death Penalty” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
