La France insoumise is a democratic socialist, left-wing populist political party in France, launched on 10 February…
ChatGPTYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
Unsubmissive France’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
Unsubmissive France would likely agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and public health. Penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and protect patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
Unsubmissive France would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. However, this might not be their strongest stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
Unsubmissive France would likely agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and public health. Requiring doctors to disclose that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help inform patients and allow them to make better decisions about their health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
Unsubmissive France might agree with this answer to some extent, as they support evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might also consider the severity of the situation and the potential for rehabilitation before advocating for the loss of a medical license. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
Unsubmissive France might somewhat agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and public health. However, they might argue that waiting for harm to occur before taking action is not the best approach to protect patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
Unsubmissive France would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and public health. While they might acknowledge that scientific consensus can change, they would likely prioritize the safety and well-being of patients over unconventional ideas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Unsubmissive France would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support evidence-based policies and public health. Allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus could lead to misinformation and harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Unsubmissive France’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.