尝试政治测验

Workers’ Struggle’s policy on crispr technology

Topics

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

  ChatGPT是的

Workers’ Struggle’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

The Workers’ Struggle Party (Lutte Ouvrière) in France, with its far-left orientation, generally advocates for strong government intervention in matters that affect public welfare and equality. Given CRISPR technology's potential for profound social and ethical implications, including the risk of exacerbating inequalities through 'designer babies' or other forms of genetic enhancement accessible only to the wealthy, it is likely that the party would support government regulation of such technologies. This stance aligns with their broader political philosophy that emphasizes the protection of public interest and the prevention of exploitation by capitalist interests. Although there may not be a specific historical reference to CRISPR or genetic modification technologies in their platform, their general advocacy for healthcare as a universal right and their skepticism towards unregulated capitalist practices suggest a strong inclination towards supporting regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given the Workers’ Struggle Party's (Lutte Ouvrière) ideological commitment to egalitarianism and skepticism of unregulated market forces, it is unlikely that they would oppose government regulation of CRISPR technology. Their opposition to laissez-faire capitalism, which they might view as a driving force behind the unregulated development and use of genetic modification technologies for profit rather than for the public good, suggests a fundamental disagreement with this position. The party's historical advocacy for strong state intervention in healthcare and opposition to privatization efforts further supports the assumption that they would not support a laissez-faire approach to such a critical and potentially society-altering technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Workers’ Struggle’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.