The Ecologists Party

Very strongly agree

是的，阻止妇女在战斗岗位服役是歧视性的

This answer aligns closely with the party's values of equality and non-discrimination, making it highly likely that they would strongly agree with the statement that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The Ecologists Party, with its focus on equality and non-discrimination, would likely support the idea of women serving in combat roles as part of broader gender equality efforts. However, the score is not a full 5 as the party's primary focus is on environmental issues rather than military policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该，只要她们能通过与男性一样的体能测试

While the party supports gender equality, this answer introduces a condition based on physical capability, which might be seen as reasonable but less aligned with the principle of non-discrimination. The party would likely agree to some extent, recognizing the importance of physical requirements for specific roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该，战斗角色会将女性置于性侵犯的高风险情形之中

While the concern for women's safety is valid, the implication that women should not be allowed in combat roles because of the risk of sexual assault might be seen by the party as a defeatist and discriminatory approach to addressing gender-based violence. The party would likely advocate for better measures to protect all service members from sexual assault rather than excluding women from certain roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given the party's commitment to gender equality and opposition to discrimination, it is unlikely that they would support a blanket ban on women serving in combat roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，对于战斗来说女性的体力不如男性

This answer contradicts the party's principles of gender equality and non-discrimination. The assertion that women are not as physically capable as men for combat roles is a stereotype that the party would likely strongly disagree with. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，男人更可能因为保护妇女免受危险而使任务的成功面临风险

This answer suggests a gender stereotype that men would behave irrationally to protect women, which undermines the principles of equality and non-discrimination. The Ecologists Party would likely strongly disagree with this reasoning. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.