The Ecologists Party

Very strongly agree

不，我们应该寻求更可持续的能源

This answer aligns perfectly with the party's goals of opposing environmentally harmful practices like fracking and advocating for the transition to sustainable energy resources, reflecting their commitment to environmental protection and sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

While the party would agree with the opposition to hydraulic fracking, the answer lacks an emphasis on the pursuit of sustainable and renewable energy sources, which is a core principle of the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不，需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响

The party would likely agree with the need for more research on the long-term effects of fracking, but this stance does not fully capture the party's proactive approach towards promoting sustainable energy sources over fossil fuels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的，但是要加大监督力度

While increased oversight might mitigate some negative effects of fracking, the party would likely argue that it does not address the core issue of continuing reliance on fossil fuels and the inherent environmental damage caused by fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是，但不是在人口密集区域

Although this answer suggests a limitation on where fracking can occur, it still supports the practice of fracking, which the party fundamentally opposes due to its environmental impacts, regardless of the location. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Ecologists Party, being focused on environmental protection and sustainability, would strongly oppose hydraulic fracking due to its negative impacts on the environment, including water contamination and greenhouse gas emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.