尝试政治测验

The Ecologists’ policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The Ecologists’ answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Supporting the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally would be in line with The Ecologists Party's principles of fairness, equality, and access to information, making this a highly agreeable stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Given their likely support for net neutrality and equal access to information, The Ecologists Party would strongly agree with maintaining equal access to all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial backing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This statement aligns with the values of The Ecologists Party by highlighting concerns over competition, artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which could harm consumers and small businesses, aligning with their advocacy for fairness and sustainability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While this approach attempts to find a middle ground by prioritizing by type rather than source, The Ecologists Party might still view it as a compromise to net neutrality, albeit less severe than other forms of prioritization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

Although this approach suggests a pay-per-quality model, The Ecologists Party would likely view it skeptically as it could still lead to unequal access to information, going against their principles of equality and net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Ecologists Party, with its focus on equality and environmental sustainability, would likely oppose practices that could lead to an unequal and tiered internet, as it goes against the principles of net neutrality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

The Ecologists Party would probably disagree with this statement, as it implies prioritizing access based on financial capabilities, which could undermine the principles of net neutrality and equal access. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to The Ecologists’ policies? Take the political quiz to find out.