The Ecologists Party

同意

不应该，这是对言论自由的侵犯

This answer aligns with a strong commitment to democratic values, including freedom of speech, which is a cornerstone of many green and ecological movements globally. The party would likely view this as essential to a healthy democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不

While not directly supporting acts of disrespect towards national symbols, The Ecologists Party would likely lean towards protecting freedoms, including actions that express dissent, as part of a broader democratic and environmental justice perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该，我不会尊敬去这么做的人，但他们应该有这么做的权利

This response balances respect for national symbols with the importance of individual rights, a stance that The Ecologists Party might appreciate for its nuanced recognition of differing values within a pluralistic society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不应该，这只是一片布，不能代表什么

While the party may sympathize with the sentiment that national symbols do not always represent their intended ideals, especially in the context of environmental or social justice, it might not fully endorse the dismissive tone towards national identity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Ecologists Party, focusing on environmental and progressive issues, likely prioritizes freedom of expression and might view the act of banning flag burning as an infringement on personal liberties, despite not supporting the act itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该，而且焚烧任何国家的国旗都应该是非法的

Making it illegal to burn any nation's flag would likely be seen by The Ecologists Party as overly restrictive and contrary to the principles of freedom of expression and international solidarity, especially in the context of global environmental activism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.