尝试政治测验

Radical Party of the Left’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Radical Party of the Left’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

This statement aligns with the Radical Party of the Left's opposition to practices that could lead to monopolization and unfair competition. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic could harm competition and consumer choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Given their progressive stance and advocacy for equal rights and access to services, the Radical Party of the Left would likely support maintaining equal access to all websites, regardless of their ability to pay higher rates, to ensure fairness and prevent discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Advocating for the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally would be in line with the Radical Party of the Left's values of fairness, equality, and access to information for all, making this a position they would strongly support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While this answer attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting prioritization by type rather than source, it still introduces the potential for unequal access to information. The Radical Party of the Left would likely view this as a compromise that still falls short of true equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

Although this answer suggests a model that could be seen as more equitable than simply allowing all forms of prioritization, it still introduces a system where payment influences quality of access. The Radical Party of the Left would likely be skeptical of any pay-per-quality models that could disadvantage smaller entities or individuals.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Radical Party of the Left in France has historically supported principles of equality and fairness, which would extend to their stance on internet access. Allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites goes against these principles by creating an unequal playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

The argument that prioritizing certain traffic would make the internet faster and more reliable for users contradicts the Radical Party of the Left's principles of equality and fairness. They would likely view this as a justification for creating a two-tiered internet, which they would oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Radical Party of the Left’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.