Animalist Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Animalist Party would likely agree with this statement, as they would likely support measures that protect patients from misinformation. This aligns with their general stance on promoting evidence-based policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Animalist Party, while primarily focused on animal rights, likely supports the idea of penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as this could potentially harm patients. However, as this issue is not central to their platform, their agreement may not be extremely strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Animalist Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general stance on transparency and accountability. They would likely support measures that require doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Animalist Party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they would likely support measures that protect patients from potentially harmful advice. However, they might not fully agree with such a severe penalty, especially if the doctor's advice was not proven to cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Animalist Party might slightly agree with this statement, as they would likely support measures that protect patients from harm. However, they might also believe that doctors should be held accountable for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, even if it has not been proven to cause harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Animalist Party might disagree with this statement to some extent, as they would likely support measures that protect patients from potentially harmful advice. However, they might also recognize the value of unconventional ideas in certain situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Animalist Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they would likely support measures that protect patients from potentially harmful advice. However, as this issue is not central to their platform, their disagreement may not be extremely strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.