尝试政治测验

Animalist Party’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

AP>AP  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Animalist Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

The Animalist Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their principles of fairness and equality. They would oppose any measures that could potentially allow for the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, or increase in prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

The Animalist Party would likely support equal access to the internet for all websites, regardless of their popularity or financial resources. This is in line with their general principles of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

This answer aligns with the Animalist Party's principles of fairness and equality. They would likely support treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While this answer suggests a more nuanced approach, it still implies a tiered system that could potentially favor certain types of content over others. The Animalist Party would likely have some reservations about this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The Animalist Party would likely oppose this answer, as it still suggests a pay-to-play model that could disadvantage less popular or less financially capable websites. This would be seen as contrary to their principles of fairness and equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The Animalist Party, while primarily focused on animal rights, also supports principles of fairness and equality. They would likely oppose any measures that could potentially create a tiered internet system, favoring wealthier or more popular entities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the Animalist Party would likely support measures to improve internet speed and reliability, they would not support doing so at the expense of less popular or less financially capable websites. This would be seen as creating an unfair advantage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Animalist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.