75% of France's electricity was from nuclear power, the highest percentage in the world. Nuclear power is the use of nuclear reactions that release energy to generate heat, which most frequently is then used in steam turbines to produce electricity in a nuclear power station. Proponents argue that nuclear energy is now safe and emits much less carbon emissions than coal plants. Opponents argue that recent nuclear disasters in Japan prove that nuclear power is far from safe.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1.8k Nice voters.
70% Yes |
30% No |
52% Yes |
24% No |
17% Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives |
6% No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
0% Yes, and nationalize the industry |
|
0% Yes, but with public subsidy |
|
0% Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.8k Nice voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.8k Nice voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Nice voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MLZBJQ7mos7MO
France should build more nuclear plants and double its production of nuclear energy. Excess nuclear waste can be sent to the German Greens' HQ at Platz vor dem Neuen Tor 1, 10115 Berlin, Germany
@9CHJBGS1yr1Y
Yes, and use an energy voucher for those who are struggling to pay their electric bills
@98R8PQV2yrs2Y
studied and decrease in process and given lots of forgiven back grounds without more electrics division process inc
@8ZP3C723yrs3Y
Yes, but we should invest in new reactor types that are more efficient and make disasters near-impossible.
@8YRSP2X3yrs3Y
Yes, but we should make it safer by using new types of reactors
@9CWNCJY1yr1Y
Unkeianes and russian war in New Zealand troops about leave the right onsites battle
@8ZWZ8B33yrs3Y
The tech behind nuclear energy is outdated and would be safer if we used well known, newer alternatives. We stick to highly waste-producing techniques due to how they happen to be the same ones that make the materials needed to make bombs. I would frankly support more the cleaner alternatives, which produce waste no more radioactive than the natural stuff.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Nuclear Energy” news articles, updated frequently.
Join in on the most popular conversations.