Workers’ Struggle Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

This answer aligns closely with Workers’ Struggle's ideology of imposing strict limits on the wealth and income of the capitalist class to redistribute wealth more equitably. A 20% cap would be seen as a strong measure against financial sector excesses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

Nationalizing the banks is a policy that would be strongly supported by Workers’ Struggle as it aligns with their goal of dismantling capitalist structures and placing key sectors of the economy under public and worker control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

While Workers’ Struggle would support capping bankers' bonuses to reduce inequality, they might prefer an even lower cap than 50%. However, this proposal still moves in the direction of their goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

Workers’ Struggle (Lutte Ouvrière) would likely agree with capping bankers' bonuses as it aligns with their general stance against excessive wealth accumulation by the capitalist class. However, they might view a 100% cap as too lenient, given their more radical stance on economic reforms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

As a far-left political party, Workers’ Struggle would strongly disagree with the notion of not capping bankers' bonuses. They argue against the capitalist system and the excessive earnings of those at the top of the financial sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

Workers’ Struggle would strongly disagree with this statement as it contradicts their fundamental opposition to the capitalist system and the principle of workers being rewarded excessively based on 'success' that often comes at the expense of the working class. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.