Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Electoral

Union for a Popular Movement’s policy on criminal politicians

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  ChatGPTNo, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Union for a Popular Movement’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

The UMP, being a party that values law and order, would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely support measures to ensure that politicians under investigation for a crime are not allowed to run for office, as this could undermine public trust in the political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The UMP would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely support measures to exclude individuals convicted of serious crimes from running for office, while potentially allowing those convicted of less serious crimes to run, especially if they have made amends for their past mistakes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

The UMP would likely lean towards not allowing a convicted politician to run for office, especially if the crime was serious or related to their political duties. However, they may not fully agree with this statement as it could potentially exclude individuals who have made amends for their past mistakes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The UMP might slightly agree with this statement. They may believe in second chances and the ability of individuals to reform, especially if they have served their sentence. However, they would likely still have reservations, especially if the crime was serious or related to their political duties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The UMP might be neutral on this statement. While they would likely agree that crimes committed while in office are particularly serious, they may also believe that any criminal conviction could potentially undermine a politician's credibility and ability to serve. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) is a center-right party that values law and order. While they may not completely oppose the idea of a convicted politician running for office, they would likely have reservations, especially if the crime was serious or related to their political duties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Union for a Popular Movement’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.