Sovereign Republic Party

Agree

Yes

The Sovereign Republic Party, with its focus on national sovereignty and potentially a degree of economic nationalism, might see the allowance of self-hosted digital wallets as a way to empower citizens against global financial systems and digital monopolies. However, their agreement might not be strong due to the emphasis on government monitoring, which could be seen as a necessary compromise rather than an ideal policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

The party might see some merit in banning digital wallets without backdoor access for government agencies as a means to ensure national security and prevent financial crimes. However, this stance might not be strongly supported due to potential concerns over privacy rights and the overreach of government powers into the personal financial affairs of citizens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

This party might not strongly disagree with the concept of digital wallets, as they could be seen as tools for financial independence and sovereignty. However, outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets might be too restrictive and against the principles of personal freedom and sovereignty, hence the slight disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

Allowing a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions might be contrary to the Sovereign Republic Party's potential stance on national security and the need for some level of oversight in financial transactions to prevent illegal activities. Their focus on sovereignty could include a strong stance on maintaining control and oversight over financial transactions within their borders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.