Reconquest Party

Strongly agree

No, private transactions should be kept private

This answer aligns most closely with the 'Reconquest' party's likely stance on financial privacy. They would likely strongly agree with the idea that private transactions should be kept private, and be against any measures that could potentially infringe on this privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Given the conservative leanings of the hypothetical 'Reconquest' party, they would likely support the idea of financial privacy and be against the idea of forcing online payment platforms to report all transactions over a certain amount to the IRS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, unless the transaction is considered income

This answer aligns with the 'Reconquest' party's likely stance on financial privacy, as it suggests that only transactions considered as income should be reported to the IRS. This would limit the scope of reporting and potentially reduce the risk of intrusion into private transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but the threshold should be much higher

While the 'Reconquest' party might not be entirely against some level of financial transparency, they would likely believe that the threshold should be higher than $600 to avoid unnecessary intrusion into private transactions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, except for low income citizens

The 'Reconquest' party might be somewhat sympathetic to the idea of exempting low income citizens from such reporting requirements, but they would likely still have concerns about the potential for abuse or fraud. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The French 'Reconquest' party, being a hypothetical entity, would likely lean towards a more conservative stance on financial privacy. However, they might not be entirely against some level of financial transparency for the sake of combating fraud or tax evasion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.