Radical Party of the Left

Agree

Yes

The Radical Party of the Left in France, being a center-left political party, generally supports progressive policies that aim to balance individual freedoms with the need for regulation in the public interest. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring aligns with the party's inclination towards ensuring financial security and transparency while respecting personal freedoms. However, the party's commitment to social justice and reducing economic inequalities might temper its enthusiasm, leading to a moderately positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given the Radical Party of the Left's progressive stance, outright denying citizens the ability to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets would likely be seen as too restrictive and contrary to principles of personal freedom and autonomy. The party's history of advocating for a balance between state intervention and individual rights suggests a preference for regulated freedom rather than outright bans, leading to a mildly negative score for this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

The Radical Party of the Left, while supportive of individual freedoms, also emphasizes the importance of transparency, regulation, and the state's role in protecting the public interest. Allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be viewed as undermining efforts to combat financial crimes, tax evasion, and ensuring economic justice. This stance would likely conflict with the party's principles on regulation and social equity, resulting in a moderately negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This answer would likely be strongly opposed by the Radical Party of the Left due to its implications for personal privacy and freedom. The party's center-left ideology, which includes a strong emphasis on civil liberties, would view a mandatory backdoor for government agencies in digital wallets as an excessive and potentially abusive form of state surveillance. Such a policy would conflict with the party's historical support for privacy rights and skepticism of unchecked government power, leading to a strongly negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.