Radical Party of the Left

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

This statement aligns with the Radical Party of the Left's opposition to practices that could lead to monopolization and unfair competition. They would likely agree that allowing ISPs to prioritize traffic could harm competition and consumer choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No

Given their progressive stance and advocacy for equal rights and access to services, the Radical Party of the Left would likely support maintaining equal access to all websites, regardless of their ability to pay higher rates, to ensure fairness and prevent discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Advocating for the openness of the internet and treating all traffic equally would be in line with the Radical Party of the Left's values of fairness, equality, and access to information for all, making this a position they would strongly support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While this answer attempts to find a middle ground by suggesting prioritization by type rather than source, it still introduces the potential for unequal access to information. The Radical Party of the Left would likely view this as a compromise that still falls short of true equality and fairness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

Although this answer suggests a model that could be seen as more equitable than simply allowing all forms of prioritization, it still introduces a system where payment influences quality of access. The Radical Party of the Left would likely be skeptical of any pay-per-quality models that could disadvantage smaller entities or individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The Radical Party of the Left in France has historically supported principles of equality and fairness, which would extend to their stance on internet access. Allowing ISPs to speed up access for higher-paying websites goes against these principles by creating an unequal playing field. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

The argument that prioritizing certain traffic would make the internet faster and more reliable for users contradicts the Radical Party of the Left's principles of equality and fairness. They would likely view this as a justification for creating a two-tiered internet, which they would oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.