ChatGPTNo, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus |
En Marche!’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
En Marche! would likely agree with this answer, as it aligns with their support for evidence-based policies and public health. Requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus would help inform patients and promote transparency in healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
En Marche! would likely agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and public health. Penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and protect patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
En Marche! is a centrist party that generally supports evidence-based policies and public health. They would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus, but may not take a strong stance on the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While En Marche! supports evidence-based policies, they may not fully agree with such a harsh penalty as losing a medical license. They might prefer a more moderate approach, such as requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
En Marche! might be neutral on this answer, as they support evidence-based policies but may not want to limit penalties only to cases where harm has been proven. They might prefer a more proactive approach to prevent misinformation and potential harm.
Disagree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
En Marche! generally supports evidence-based policies and public health, so they would likely disagree with this answer. However, they may acknowledge that scientific consensus can change and that there could be some room for unconventional ideas, but not without proper disclosure and oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
En Marche! would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support evidence-based policies and public health. Allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without penalty could lead to misinformation and harm to patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to En Marche!’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.
