Animalist Party

Agree

Yes, and increase the amount

Increasing funding for the WHO could support broader health initiatives, including those that impact animal welfare, such as combating zoonotic diseases. The Animalist Party might see this as beneficial, aligning with their goals of promoting health and welfare for all beings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Animalist Party, focusing on animal rights and welfare, might see the World Health Organization as a partner in global health initiatives that could indirectly benefit animals, such as zoonotic disease control. However, their primary focus is not on human health organizations, so their agreement might not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

The Animalist Party might slightly agree with this conditional support, recognizing the importance of global cooperation in health matters. However, their main focus remains on animal welfare, which might not directly align with the WHO's activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but decrease the amount

The Animalist Party might be neutral on this issue, as decreasing funding could mean less support for global health initiatives that could benefit animals, but they might also support reallocating funds towards more direct animal welfare programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, fund national and local programs instead

While the Animalist Party strongly supports funding for animal welfare, they might recognize the importance of global health initiatives led by the WHO that can indirectly benefit animals. They would likely prefer a balance rather than shifting all funds to national and local programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Animalist Party might prioritize funding for animal welfare over human health organizations, they are unlikely to strongly oppose funding for the WHO, recognizing the interconnectedness of human and animal health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it has shown to be ineffective

The Animalist Party is unlikely to view the WHO as ineffective, given the organization's role in global health issues that also affect animals. They would probably disagree with this statement, favoring a more nuanced approach to funding and effectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.