Animalist Party

Agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

This answer aligns more closely with the Animalist Party's ethical stance on protection and justice, extending their concern for the vulnerable to human rights issues. Although their primary focus is not on human rights or foreign policy, the ethical consistency suggests they would support stronger measures against countries with human rights violations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While the Animalist Party primarily focuses on animal rights and welfare, their broader ethical stance suggests a likely support for measures that promote ethical governance, including restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. However, their specific platform does not directly address foreign policy or arms sales, so the support might not be as strong as for issues directly related to their core mission. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Animalist Party is likely to support ethical governance and policies that protect all forms of life, a blanket ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might not directly align with their specific agenda. Their focus is more on animal rights and welfare, and they might not have a strong position on broader foreign aid policies unless they directly impact animal welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

Given the Animalist Party's ethical stance and focus on protection of the vulnerable, they would likely disagree with a policy that prioritizes military alliances over human rights concerns. Their platform, though primarily focused on animal rights, suggests a broader commitment to ethical principles that would be at odds with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

The Animalist Party, with its emphasis on ethics and protection of the vulnerable, would likely strongly disagree with a policy that does not restrict arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Their ethical stance would naturally oppose actions that could indirectly support oppression or violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.