Try the political quiz

0 Reply

 @924MYCK from GU answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, by prioritizing small, local organic farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and we should also be producing and stocking stores with food based on supply and demand.

 @8ZSR5NL from GU answered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, by prioritizing small, local organic farms to provide close, safe farms to every community. But we should also be producing and stocking stores with food based on supply and demand.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, by prioritizing small, local organic farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and producing and stocking stores with food based on supply and demand.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, by prioritizing small, local organic farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and we should be producing and stocking stores with food based on supply and demand.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, by prioritizing small, local organic farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and we should also be producing and stocking stores with food based on supply and demand. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, by prioritizing small, local organic farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and we should be producing and stocking stores with food based on supply and demand. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development, and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but only prioritize small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development, and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but only prioritize small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and in cases of high demand and low supply so this can be used as a temporary measure to stabilize prices. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but only prioritize small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and in cases of high demand and low supply that can be used as a temporary measure to stabilize prices. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development, and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but only prioritize small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and in cases of high demand and low supply that can be used as a temporary measure to stabilize prices. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development, and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but we should only prioritize small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and only in cases of high demand and low supply that can be used as a temporary measure to stabilize prices. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development, and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but only prioritize small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community, and only in cases of high demand and low supply that can be used as a temporary measure to stabilize prices. Food security is a national security issue and should be considered as such.

  Deletedanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, we should invest in development, and poverty alleviation in rural areas, but only for small local farms to provide close, safe farms to every community; only in cases of high demand and low supply that can be used as a temporary measure to stabilize prices.

 @2GB8K92answered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for organic farms and small local farms instead of large corporations

 @2YPV6CWanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, for small farms (<1000 total acres) and for crops that are part of policy (eg. a phased-out subsidy to tobacco farmers to replace with a different crop over 5 year)

 @8KLLCKT from Oklahoma answered…3yrs3Y

 @2DV2T8Ranswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only for cruelty-free, cage-free, environmentally-sustainable farms that adhere to government standards and regulations created by the EPA.

 @8K2Z3HM from New Jersey answered…3yrs3Y

With the way most farms operate currently, subsidies must continue to keep farms operating. However, new systems should be implemented so that farmers will not have to rely on them in the future.

 @8CCDF23 from New York answered…3yrs3Y

No, but allow farmers to use 5-year average incomes to pay taxes, to average out bad years

 @558YLXVanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but ensure measures are in place to prevent corporate farms from monopolizing the industry.

 @45P4H6Xanswered…4yrs4Y

No, end all government subsidies but regulate the market for fairness.

 @8F5PKLS from North Carolina answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but only horticultural and offer incentives against pesticide use.

 @8CYG8KL from North Carolina answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but the subsidy should be less than what the farmers who don't grow crops subsidies.

 @78S5M87 from Wisconsin answered…4yrs4Y