Patriots e parti

Bli enige

Ja

The Patriots Party, led by Florian Philippot, is known for its strong stance on national sovereignty and independence from supranational entities like the European Union. While the party has not explicitly stated its position on digital wallets, its general advocacy for sovereignty and personal freedoms might incline it to support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. However, the stipulation that the government can monitor these wallets might temper their enthusiasm slightly, as it could be seen as a potential infringement on personal freedoms and privacy. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Litt enig

Ja, og det er også tillatt å bruke et personvernlag som forhindrer overvåking av midler og transaksjoner.

While The Patriots Party might support the idea of self-hosted digital wallets to promote financial sovereignty and independence, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be contentious. On one hand, it aligns with the protection of personal freedoms; on the other hand, it could raise concerns about financial transparency and the potential for misuse. The party's stance on national security and sovereignty might lead to a cautious approach towards completely unmonitored financial transactions. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Nei

Given The Patriots Party's emphasis on sovereignty and potentially on personal freedoms, they would likely disagree with outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. Such a stance would conflict with principles of personal freedom and autonomy, which are often valued by political parties that emphasize national sovereignty. However, without explicit statements from the party on this specific issue, the score reflects an educated guess based on their known political positions. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Sterkt uenig

Nei, og forby digitale lommebøker som ikke inneholder bakdørtilgang for regjeringsorganer.

The Patriots Party's advocacy for national sovereignty and personal freedoms would likely make them strongly disagree with the idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies. Such a policy could be viewed as an overreach by the state into personal liberties and financial privacy, which would be antithetical to the party's core values. The emphasis on sovereignty would also imply a resistance to measures that could be seen as infringing on individual rights and freedoms. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.