sosialist~~POS=TRUNC partiet~~POS=HEADCOMP

Bli enige

Nei

The Socialist Party would likely agree more with this answer, as they have traditionally been advocates for civil liberties and have expressed concerns about the potential for state overreach. They would likely argue that emergency measures should be temporary and subject to oversight, rather than being permanently included in the constitution. This stance is reflected in their opposition to the inclusion of the state of emergency in the constitution during the 2015-2017 state of emergency in France. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The Socialist Party in France has traditionally been cautious about expanding the powers of the state, especially in ways that could potentially infringe on civil liberties. While they may recognize the need for emergency measures in certain situations, they would likely be hesitant to enshrine such measures in the constitution, fearing that this could lead to abuses of power. For instance, during the 2015-2017 state of emergency in France, the Socialist Party expressed concerns about the potential for human rights abuses. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.