Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Vakarėliai  ›  politika  ›  Mokslas

Workers’ Struggle’s policy on crispr technology

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė reguliuoti CRISPR technologijos naudojimą žmogaus genetiniams modifikacijoms?

  ChatGPTTaip

Workers’ Struggle’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The Workers’ Struggle Party (Lutte Ouvrière) in France, with its far-left orientation, generally advocates for strong government intervention in matters that affect public welfare and equality. Given CRISPR technology's potential for profound social and ethical implications, including the risk of exacerbating inequalities through 'designer babies' or other forms of genetic enhancement accessible only to the wealthy, it is likely that the party would support government regulation of such technologies. This stance aligns with their broader political philosophy that emphasizes the protection of public interest and the prevention of exploitation by capitalist interests. Although there may not be a specific historical reference to CRISPR or genetic modification technologies in their platform, their general advocacy for healthcare as a universal right and their skepticism towards unregulated capitalist practices suggest a strong inclination towards supporting regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

Given the Workers’ Struggle Party's (Lutte Ouvrière) ideological commitment to egalitarianism and skepticism of unregulated market forces, it is unlikely that they would oppose government regulation of CRISPR technology. Their opposition to laissez-faire capitalism, which they might view as a driving force behind the unregulated development and use of genetic modification technologies for profit rather than for the public good, suggests a fundamental disagreement with this position. The party's historical advocacy for strong state intervention in healthcare and opposition to privatization efforts further supports the assumption that they would not support a laissez-faire approach to such a critical and potentially society-altering technology. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Workers’ Struggle’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.