The Greens Political Party

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

The Greens party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. Penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help decrease misinformation and promote patient safety. However, this score is not the highest because the party's primary focus is on environmental and social issues, rather than medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Greens party would likely agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. However, this score is not the highest because the party's primary focus is on environmental and social issues, rather than medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.

The Greens party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. However, the severity of the penalty (losing their medical license) might be seen as too harsh, and the party's primary focus is on environmental and social issues, rather than medical regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą

The Greens party might slightly agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. However, they might argue that waiting for the advice to be proven harmful is reactive rather than proactive, and that doctors should be held to a higher standard of providing evidence-based advice from the outset. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.

The Greens party might be neutral on this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. While requiring doctors to disclose that their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus is a step in the right direction, it might not be enough to ensure patient safety and well-being. The party's primary focus is on environmental and social issues, rather than medical regulation, so this answer might not be a priority for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.

The Greens party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. While they might acknowledge that scientific consensus can change, they would likely argue that doctors should adhere to current best practices to ensure patient safety and well-being. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

The Greens party would likely disagree with this answer, as they tend to support evidence-based policies and practices. Allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without penalty could lead to misinformation and potentially harmful outcomes for patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.