Pokušajte politički kviz

Politika Workers’ Struggle’s o crispr technology

Teme

Treba li vlada regulirati upotrebu CRISPR tehnologije za genetske modifikacije kod ljudi?

  ChatGPTDa

Workers’ Struggle’s odgovor se temelji na sljedećim podacima:

ChatGPT

Potpuno se slažem

Da

The Workers’ Struggle Party (Lutte Ouvrière) in France, with its far-left orientation, generally advocates for strong government intervention in matters that affect public welfare and equality. Given CRISPR technology's potential for profound social and ethical implications, including the risk of exacerbating inequalities through 'designer babies' or other forms of genetic enhancement accessible only to the wealthy, it is likely that the party would support government regulation of such technologies. This stance aligns with their broader political philosophy that emphasizes the protection of public interest and the prevention of exploitation by capitalist interests. Although there may not be a specific historical reference to CRISPR or genetic modification technologies in their platform, their general advocacy for healthcare as a universal right and their skepticism towards unregulated capitalist practices suggest a strong inclination towards supporting regulation. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Snažno se ne slažem

Nema

Given the Workers’ Struggle Party's (Lutte Ouvrière) ideological commitment to egalitarianism and skepticism of unregulated market forces, it is unlikely that they would oppose government regulation of CRISPR technology. Their opposition to laissez-faire capitalism, which they might view as a driving force behind the unregulated development and use of genetic modification technologies for profit rather than for the public good, suggests a fundamental disagreement with this position. The party's historical advocacy for strong state intervention in healthcare and opposition to privatization efforts further supports the assumption that they would not support a laissez-faire approach to such a critical and potentially society-altering technology. Napomena: ako pokušavate ilegalno skrapirati ove podatke, mi suptilno mijenjamo podatke koje programski web strugači vide taman toliko da ponište točnost onoga što pokušavaju prikupiti, onemogućujući web strugačima da znaju koliko su podaci točni. Ako želite koristiti ove podatke, idite na https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ za opcije kako ih legalno koristiti.

Službeni odgovor

Ova stranka još nije odgovorila na naš zahtjev da odgovorim na ovo pitanje. Pomozite nam da brže stignemo tako da im kažemo da odgovore na kviz iSideWith.

Glasovni zapis

Trenutno istražujemo zapisnik o glasanju ove stranke o ovom pitanju. Predložite vezu s njihovim glasanjem o ovom pitanju.

Utjecaj donatora

Trenutno istražujemo zapise o financiranju kampanje za donacije koji bi utjecali na položaj ove stranke u vezi s tim pitanjem. Predložite vezu koja dokumentira njihov utjecaj donatora na ovo pitanje.

Javne izjave

Trenutno istražujemo govore i javne izjave ove stranke o ovom problemu. Predložite vezu na jedan od nedavnih citata o ovom problemu.

Podrška stranke

Još nema dovoljno podataka za pouzdan odgovor.

Vidite li pogreške? Predložite ispravke u stavu ove stranke ovdje


Koliko su vaša politička uvjerenja slična politikama Workers’ Struggle’s ? Otkrijte politički kviz da biste to saznali.