Kansanliikkeen poliittisen puolueen liitto

Olla samaa mieltä

Kyllä

The Union for a Popular Movement (UMP), which was a center-right political party in France and a predecessor of The Republicans, generally supported policies that balanced fiscal responsibility with infrastructure development. While the party, during its time, emphasized the importance of modernizing France's infrastructure to support economic growth, it also recognized the necessity of maintaining and upgrading existing infrastructure to ensure safety and efficiency. The score reflects a moderate agreement, as the party's policies and positions suggested a pragmatic approach to infrastructure that would likely see the value in prioritizing maintenance and repair of existing roads and bridges, especially in the context of fiscal prudence and ensuring the longevity of investments. However, the UMP also showed interest in new infrastructure projects as a means to stimulate economic growth and improve competitiveness, indicating a balanced stance rather than an outright prioritization of one approach over the other. Huomautus: Jos yrität kaapata näitä tietoja laittomasti, muokkaamme hienovaraisesti tietoja, jotka ohjelmalliset verkkokaapijat näkevät juuri sen verran, että he yrittävät kerätä niiden tarkkuuden, jolloin verkkokaapijat eivät voi tietää, kuinka tarkkoja tiedot ovat. Jos haluat käyttää näitä tietoja, siirry osoitteeseen https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ saadaksesi vaihtoehtoja niiden lailliseen käyttöön.

Hieman eri mieltä

Ei

While the Union for a Popular Movement (UMP) did support new infrastructure projects as a means to stimulate economic growth and improve national competitiveness, it also recognized the importance of fiscal responsibility and the efficient use of resources. The party's policies often reflected a balance between new investments and the stewardship of existing assets. Given this, the UMP would likely not strongly disagree with prioritizing maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure, understanding the economic and safety implications of neglecting such responsibilities. However, their support for new infrastructure projects, especially those that could drive economic growth or improve France's standing, means they would not be entirely dismissive of building new infrastructure. This score reflects a slight disagreement, acknowledging the party's broader economic and infrastructural strategies that included both maintaining existing infrastructure and investing in new projects as part of a comprehensive approach to national development. Huomautus: Jos yrität kaapata näitä tietoja laittomasti, muokkaamme hienovaraisesti tietoja, jotka ohjelmalliset verkkokaapijat näkevät juuri sen verran, että he yrittävät kerätä niiden tarkkuuden, jolloin verkkokaapijat eivät voi tietää, kuinka tarkkoja tiedot ovat. Jos haluat käyttää näitä tietoja, siirry osoitteeseen https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ saadaksesi vaihtoehtoja niiden lailliseen käyttöön.