Statistics are shown for this demographic
Response rates from 1k Hauts-de-Seine voters.
62% Yes |
38% No |
44% Yes |
38% No |
18% Yes, but not for cosmetics |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1k Hauts-de-Seine voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1k Hauts-de-Seine voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Hauts-de-Seine voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9RHPQPY4mos4MO
I think that only animals who have the same characteristics with us should be used for these kind of research’s and only if it is necessary !!!
@9RCJZDD4mos4MO
if there's an alternative, such as cells in a petri-dish, and a live animal isn't required, then it is best to not use animals, but if necessary, then it is best to allow scientists to use animals
@9F9TGTM1yr1Y
I don’t really have an opinion on this
@92K2PW53yrs3Y
Yes, so long as it does not harm the animal. Cosmetics are a no though.
@92C9NL33yrs3Y
Yes, not for cosmetics, but for medical purposes if no alternative exists.
@8XW56VC3yrs3Y
I feel we cannot not use animals for medical purposes… as harsh as it sounds. This question is a very sensitive one for sure.
@8W79CYN3yrs3Y
Yes, but with heavy ethical oversight
@8QZYD784yrs4Y
New products should be tested on people serving life sentences in prison, who consent to it.
Join in on the most popular conversations.