In December 2016 the French National Assembly passed the Sapin II regime which is a series of laws aimed at combating corruption. The law included a whistleblower protection clause which requires companies with more than 50 employees to establish a framework which protects whistleblowers from retaliation and grants them anonymity. The law does not protect or incentivize whistleblowing by implicated parties and the whistleblower must have firsthand knowledge of the facts.
@8Q5FHVX3yrs3Y
No. Let the Emperor grant Mercy to exceptionnal cases in all judiciary matters or else if the Raison d'État requires it. This way, many problems are solved without even going against the spirit of the foreign imposed constitution... since H.I.M. could grant mercy to anyone benefiting from popular support or unfairly oppressed by the arbitrary of the State mechanics.
@buday4vancouver3yrs3Y
Give them "Time Served," under a No Recrimination Act, as long as information proves true and leads to convictions. Anyone falsely accused has rights.. Don't treat them like heroes, unless they had nothing to do with what they witnessed.
@EdmundSnow983yrs3Y
Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security and only if the information was legally obtained.
@buday4vancouver3yrs3Y
Give them "Time Served" under a No Recrimination Act. Don't treat them like heroes, unless they had nothing to do with what they witnessed.
@89SH3SL3yrs3Y
Yes, but only when they use legal processes
@89CY6474yrs4Y
No special laws are necessary. If there is no victim, there is no crime.
@8F6GY5L4yrs4Y
yes if it reduces their sentence and give some form of protection
@78S5M874yrs4Y
pardon all people who are not a threat to our society or themselves.
@78S5M874yrs4Y
Yes, pardon all people who are not a threat to our society or themselves.
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...