Union for et populært parti

Enig

Ja

The Union for a Popular Movement (UMP), which was rebranded as The Republicans in 2015, has historically supported policies that balance individual freedoms with state oversight for national security and economic stability. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets with government monitoring aligns with the party's moderate approach to financial regulation and digital innovation, promoting financial autonomy while ensuring oversight. However, the party's commitment to security and regulatory compliance might temper its enthusiasm, hence a moderately positive score. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

The UMP, with its focus on security and regulatory compliance, might see the merit in digital wallets having backdoor access for government agencies as a means to combat financial crimes and terrorism financing. This aligns with the party's broader support for policies that strengthen national security and regulatory oversight. However, this support might be tempered by concerns over privacy and individual freedoms, reflecting a cautious endorsement of such measures. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Given the UMP's (now The Republicans) general stance on encouraging economic freedom while ensuring state security, outright opposition to citizens securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets seems unlikely. The party has shown interest in embracing digital innovation and financial autonomy, suggesting a negative score for outright disallowance. However, their emphasis on security and regulatory frameworks means they would not fully support a system without any form of government oversight. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

The UMP, known for its center-right positioning, has historically advocated for a balance between personal freedoms and national security. The proposal to allow a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would likely be viewed as a threat to national security and financial transparency, principles the party values. This stance is consistent with the party's broader skepticism towards policies that could hinder law enforcement and regulatory oversight. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.