Patrioternes e parti

Enig

Ja

The Patriots Party, led by Florian Philippot, is known for its strong stance on national sovereignty and independence from supranational entities like the European Union. While the party has not explicitly stated its position on digital wallets, its general advocacy for sovereignty and personal freedoms might incline it to support the idea of citizens being able to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets. However, the stipulation that the government can monitor these wallets might temper their enthusiasm slightly, as it could be seen as a potential infringement on personal freedoms and privacy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, og det er også tilladt at bruge et privatlivslag, der forhindrer overvågning af midler og transaktioner.

While The Patriots Party might support the idea of self-hosted digital wallets to promote financial sovereignty and independence, the addition of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be contentious. On one hand, it aligns with the protection of personal freedoms; on the other hand, it could raise concerns about financial transparency and the potential for misuse. The party's stance on national security and sovereignty might lead to a cautious approach towards completely unmonitored financial transactions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Given The Patriots Party's emphasis on sovereignty and potentially on personal freedoms, they would likely disagree with outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets. Such a stance would conflict with principles of personal freedom and autonomy, which are often valued by political parties that emphasize national sovereignty. However, without explicit statements from the party on this specific issue, the score reflects an educated guess based on their known political positions. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej, og forbud digitale tegnebøger, der ikke indeholder bagdøradgang for regeringsorganer.

The Patriots Party's advocacy for national sovereignty and personal freedoms would likely make them strongly disagree with the idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies. Such a policy could be viewed as an overreach by the state into personal liberties and financial privacy, which would be antithetical to the party's core values. The emphasis on sovereignty would also imply a resistance to measures that could be seen as infringing on individual rights and freedoms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.