Article 49 of the French constitution details the relationships of power between the Prime Minister and Parliament. Clause 3 of this article (49.3) gives the government the power to pass a measure without a vote from parliament. The article allows the government to compel the majority if reluctant to adopt a text, and also to accelerate the legislative process, and in particular to end any obstruction from the opposition. The article has been used fewer than 90 times since its inception in 1958. In 2016 the government used the article to pass a labor reform bill which made it easier for employers to prolong the 35-hour working week, cheaper to lay off staff, and easier to overpower unions.
50% Yes |
50% No |
50% Yes |
50% No |
See how support for each position on “Article 49.3” has changed over time for 41.2k France voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Article 49.3” has changed over time for 41.2k France voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from France users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@962KL2Y1yr1Y
No, but amend it to be used under extreme circumstances
@9FLSJSF7mos7MO
Depends on how much the president uses the article.
@9BMD9KN12mos12MO
Yes, it's anti-democratic. The only time an executive should have legislative powers is in emergencies.
@99SYJ2D1yr1Y
It shall be done as long as it is not unconstitutional.
Explore other topics that are important to France voters.
@ISIDEWITH2mos2MO
An embryo is an initial stage of development of a multicellular organism. In humans, embryonic development is the part of the life cycle that begins just after fertilization of the female egg cell by the male sperm cell. In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a process of fertilization where an egg is combined…
@ISIDEWITH11yrs11Y
Australia currently has a progressive tax system whereby high income earners pay a higher percentage of tax than low income tax. A more progressive income tax system has been proposed as a tool towards reducing wealth inequality.
@ISIDEWITH6mos6MO
Proponents argue that this strategy would bolster national security by minimizing the risk of potential terrorists entering the country. Enhanced screening processes, once implemented, would provide a more thorough assessment of applicants, reducing the likelihood of malicious actors gaining entry.…