Try the political quiz

Radical Party’s policy on terrorism surveillance

Topics

Should the government arrest all people who are under surveillance for suspected terrorism (S-files)?

  ChatGPTNo, only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning an attack

Radical Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

No, only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning an attack

The Radical Party would likely strongly agree with this statement. It aligns with their stance on balancing civil liberties with the need for security. They would likely support arrests in cases where there is undeniable evidence of a planned attack, as this would be a clear threat to public safety. This approach respects due process and the principle of 'innocent until proven guilty', which are key values for the Radical Party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Radical Party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support the protection of civil liberties and due process. However, they also recognize the need for security measures to protect against terrorism. Therefore, they would not completely rule out arrests, but would likely advocate for a more measured approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Radical Party in France, being a centrist party, generally supports a balanced approach to law enforcement and civil liberties. They would likely disagree with arresting all people under surveillance for suspected terrorism, as it could infringe on civil liberties and due process. There is no historical precedent of the Radical Party advocating for such a broad and potentially abusive measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 23hrs ago

Party’s support base

Radical Party Voters’ Answer: No, only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning an attack

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 90 voters that identify as Radical Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Radical Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.