The means things is transport buses and the car traveling murder by the bouncers and the security is about heard listen
French and Ireland in process transporting and progressive in or outsides with people disabilities and human tags on ands then public transports in the buses or cars oil chargers in whereabouts inc
@8RBQDDP2yrs2Y
Yes, but it should be cost effective and environmentally friendly
Deleted2yrs2Y
I’m uneducated on this issue
@924MYCK2yrs2Y
Yes, the government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc.. It should be done efficiently and productively, and adheres to more sustainable standards.
@938PWY62yrs2Y
The government should increase spending on making private transportation more efficient.
@937LQYX2yrs2Y
Yes but by utilizing more efficient private company services.
@8ZSR5NL2yrs2Y
Yes, the government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc.. Also, it should be done efficiently and productively, and adheres to more sustainable standards.
@934DCZZ2yrs2Y
Yes, but the funding should predominantly come from state and local government
@92X5HLD2yrs2Y
No, and the government should not fund any transportation services
@92MDVFR2yrs2Y
Where would the funding go to? Many metropolitan areas already have sufficient methods, so increasing subsidies to those cities would deny developing cities the budgets that they would require to address their growing needs. However, if the money would be distributed to cities with growing populations and inadequate systems, then yes, the spending would be warranted.
Deleted2yrs2Y
If it is necessary in order to improve it's quality, then yes.
@8ZSR5NL2yrs2Y
Yes, if done efficiently and productively, and with more sustainable/eco-friendly standards. The government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc.
@929DQCT2yrs2Y
Yes because some people might not have enough money for a car so they have to transport by public transportation.
@928JSGK2yrs2Y
No, public transportation should be free
@8ZSR5NL2yrs2Y
Yes, if done efficiently and productively. The government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc., and provide more free public transportation for everyone.
@9229SCK2yrs2Y
Yes. As long as there is spending for other important items. Increase spending on Eco friendly transportation.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, if done efficiently and productively. The government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc., and make sure it is. Public transportation should be free and more affordable for everyone.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, if done efficiently and productively. The government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc. Public transportation should be free and more affordable for everyone.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, if done efficiently and productively. The government should concentrate on fixing and improving stations, railroads, trains, buses, etc., and public transportation should be free and more affordable for everyone.
@8ZGMFJG2yrs2Y
Yes because many people are disabled and cannot use any other transportation than public transportation.
@8ZBTMV92yrs2Y
Yes, only in heavily populated areas
@86N5Z352yrs2Y
Yes, but let state and local governments decide how much.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, provide more free public transportation; and invest in cleaner alternatives to air travel, such as high-speed rail.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but this should be left up to state and local governments to decide. Current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses, etc.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but this should be left up to state and local governments to decide; public transportation should only be funded within states and cities, not the federal government. Current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses, etc.
@76WTH562yrs2Y
It should be the states' decision.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but this should be left up to the state and local governments to decide, and public transportation should only be funded within states and cities, not the federal government. Also, current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses, etc.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, this should be left up to the state and local governments to decide, and they should fund public transportation on states and cities, not the federal government. Other than that, current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses etc.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, this should be left up to the state and local governments to decide, not the federal government, and they should only fund public transportation within states and cities. Other than that, current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses etc.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but only state and local governments should have the responsibility to fund public transportation, and current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses etc.
@8XTSQNB2yrs2Y
Yes, as it reduces Co2 emissions and helps people everywhere to get around
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but only state and local governments should fund public transportation and current budget should be reallocated towards fixing and improving stations, trains, buses etc.
@86N5Z352yrs2Y
Yes, but let state and local governments decide.
@8XQCD4Q2yrs2Y
Yes, especially for high-speed rail projects.
@8XNT9ZQ2yrs2Y
Yes, It depends on the location. Federal government may assist states or local communities in funding to maintain some public transportation - i.e. old subway systems.
@8XHNZZH3yrs3Y
depends on how far you are going and where you are going
@8XFNL5B3yrs3Y
Yes, they should increase spending on public transportation. They also need more free transportation for people like college students, homeless people, and poor people so they have transportation.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, but it should be the responsibility of local and state governments.
@7C3ZZ8M3yrs3Y
Yes, but only by reallocating funds from other government expenses, whether that would be from military, medicare, social security, etc, but not in an excessive amount to where it dramatically impacts those categories.
@8FLGY5K3yrs3Y
No, but the government should encourage sustainable means of transportation (walking, cycling, etc.)
@8WRL5Q93yrs3Y
There is enough transportation for the average citizen to get to point A to point B. This is more a individual matter, so no.
@8VJQ9QW3yrs3Y
No, we have more important things to worry about
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, it should be handled at the state and local levels
@8WB2PR83yrs3Y
yes to make it more clean
@8W92Y773yrs3Y
This should be up to state and local municipalities.
The federal government should only be involved when State lines are crossed
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, public transportation spending should be handled on the state and local level
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, public transportation spending should be adjusted on the state and local level
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...